3M Combat Earplugs

 We are not currently taking new 3M cases at this time

3M Combat Earplugs

 We are not currently taking new 3M cases at this time

3M Combat Earplugs

 We are not currently taking new 3M cases at this time

About This Case

The 3M earplug lawsuit involves thousands of military service members and veterans who have sued 3M, alleging that the company's earplugs were defective and led to hearing damage. 


The lawsuit claims that 3M was aware of the defect but chose to keep it secret from customers, including the U.S. military. Lawsuits against 3M are ongoing and those who fit the criteria may be eligible to receive compensation for their losses, it is important to reach out for legal counsel. 

Statistics

There are currently over 230,000 military service members and veterans suing 3M for alleged hearing damage caused by their defective earplugs.

Out of the 16 "bellwether" cases that have gone to trial over the past three years, the verdicts have been split between plaintiffs and the defense. Ten cases were ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, while six cases were ruled in favor of the defense.

As of January 2023, 3M had disclosed that it has spent $466 million on attorney's fees related to the earplug lawsuit.

There are currently over 230,000 military service members and veterans suing 3M for alleged hearing damage caused by their defective earplugs.

Out of the 16 "bellwether" cases that have gone to trial over the past three years, the verdicts have been split between plaintiffs and the defense. Ten cases were ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, while six cases were ruled in favor of the defense.

As of January 2023, 3M had disclosed that it has spent $466 million on attorney's fees related to the earplug lawsuit.

There are currently over 230,000 military service members and veterans suing 3M for alleged hearing damage caused by their defective earplugs.

Out of the 16 "bellwether" cases that have gone to trial over the past three years, the verdicts have been split between plaintiffs and the defense. Ten cases were ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, while six cases were ruled in favor of the defense.

As of January 2023, 3M had disclosed that it has spent $466 million on attorney's fees related to the earplug lawsuit.

Trust A Firm With Over 10 Years Of Experience In Fighting For Others

Common

Questions

Common

Questions

Common

Questions

01

How much does it cost to hire you?

At our firm, you pay nothing upfront. We only charge a fee if we win your case, and we handle all the initial costs associated with preparing and managing your case. Our clients never receive an invoice or bill, ensuring they have access to top-notch representation without any financial burden.

02

Which earplugs are involved in the 3M earplug lawsuit?

The earplugs involved in the 3M lawsuit are the Combat Arms Earplugs Version 2 or CAEv2, which were manufactured by 3M and its predecessor Aearo Technologies between 2003 and 2015. The lawsuit claims that 3M was aware of the defect but chose to keep it secret from customers, including the U.S. military.

03

Who is allowed to file claims against 3M in the earplug lawsuit?

These include having used 3M's Combat Arms Earplug Version 2 during your military training or service, being diagnosed with hearing loss or tinnitus, and having served in the U.S. military between 2003 and 2015. Please note that no further claims are being taken at this time. If you believe that you may qualify for compensation from the 3M Earplug Lawsuit, it is strongly recommended that you contact an attorney for advice and representation.

JJJ: 3M Combat Earplugs Case Updates

Update on the 3M Combat Arms Earplugs Litigation

July 1, 2023
Recently, a federal judge dismissed a bankruptcy filing by Aearo Technologies, holding that the 3M subsidiary was financially healthy and undeserving of bankruptcy protection. This move by Aearo was an attempt to settle the claims through the bankruptcy process which could lead to delays and reduced payments. The judge's decision, however, keeps the litigation on track in the federal court system.