Latest Updates on IVC Filter Lawsuits: Understanding the Risks and Legal Developments
First introduced in 1979, Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) filters are devices used to prevent blood clots from reaching the lungs. The filters are commonly used in patients who are at risk of pulmonary embolism (a blockage), especially those who cannot take blood-thinning medications. The filter is placed in the Inferior Vena Cava, a large vein in the abdomen that returns blood from the lower body to the heart. While these filters are typically effective in stopping blood clots, they can also lead to hazardous side effects like vein perforation, filter migration, fracture, and embolization.
This article provides the latest updates on IVC filter lawsuits, highlighting the associated risks and significant legal developments. So, if you've suffered from any of the following IVC filter-related complications, you may be entitled to compensation:
- IVC filter side effects include chest pain, confusion, heart rhythm problems, hypotension, lightheadedness, nausea, neck pain, shortness of breath, hemorrhaging, and internal bleeding.
- The FDA has identified several unreasonable risks associated with IVC filters, including device fracture, migration, and perforation of organs.
- Perforation, where a part of the filter migrates through the wall of the IVC, is a common issue.
- Surgical removal of certain IVC filters can result in high morbidity and mortality rates.
- Leaving IVC filters in can lead to severe and potentially deadly injuries such as hemorrhage, pulmonary embolism, and stroke.
Recent Verdicts and Legal Progressions:
- The Seventh Circuit upheld a $3.3 million verdict in favor of Natalie Johnson in an IVC filter lawsuit against C.R. Bard.
- A judge in Montana refused to dismiss an IVC lawsuit against Bard, allowing a design defect claim to go to trial.
- There have been three plaintiffs' verdicts in recent years, including a $3.3 million verdict for a woman with a Bard Meridian IVC Filter.
- A jury awarded $386,250 in a fractured filter case against C.R. Bard.
- Bard was found negligent in causing their G2 IVC filter to fracture, resulting in a $3.6 million jury award.
- Cook Celect was ordered to pay $1.2 million in a lawsuit where they failed to warn about the risks of their IVC filter.
- Cook Medical lost a lawsuit where a woman suffered a cardiac injury from their defective IVC filter.
IVC filter lawsuits continue to unfold, with significant legal developments and verdicts shedding light on the risks associated with these devices. Patients who have experienced complications from IVC filters are encouraged to seek legal counsel and understand their rights.
Here at Jason J. Joy & Associates, we understand how difficult it can be when dealing with medical complications caused by an IVC filter, and we are committed to helping our clients receive justice for their suffering. Our team has extensive experience handling these types of cases and will work tirelessly on your behalf to ensure that you receive fair compensation for your injuries and losses.
While this article provides general legal information, it does not constitute legal advice. The best way to get guidance on your specific legal issue is to contact a lawyer.
Contact Us
By submitting this form you agree to receive text messages.


